Skip to main content

What is hypergolic rocket fuel?

We all know how rocket science is relatively complicated. Actually, not entirely. Hypergolic fuels are pretty simple. A Hypergolic fuel mixture is usually used in rockets, and consists of 2 main materials, a fuel and an oxidizer. The fuel is usually a form of Hydrazine, and the oxidizer is usually Dinitrogen Tetroxide. The Hydrazine and Dinitrogen Tetroxide ignite spontaneously upon contact, which is why it is considered Hypergolic.
Hypergolic fuels are indeed less complicated than what can be called "usual" rocket fuel, like a mixture of RP-1 (rocket grade kerosene), and LOX (liquid oxygen). The LOX helps ignite your fuel, which in this case is RP-1/Kerosene. You also need an outside ignition source to ignite the LOX + Kerosene mixture, as they do not instantly combust. With Hypergolic fuels, you don't need an outside ignition source, at all. They ignite themselves, an outside ignition source like ignition fluid or spark plugs would be quite useless.
SpaceX's Crew Dragon capsule uses a Hypergolic fuel mixture of Hydrazine + Dinitrogen Tetroxide for its abort system and Reaction Control System (RCS), because it acts fast, which is what an Abort System and RCS Need. Now you are asking, since Hypergolic fuels have all these great benefits, why not use them? Well, here's your answer. The best Hypergolic fuel mixture for efficiency and power that we can currently get, is, as mentioned before, Hydrazine + Dinitrogen Tetroxide. This mixture is extremely toxic and carcinogenic, meaning, if a little bit of it leaks or drips, it's not a good idea to be anywhere near it, like, anywhere. We also already do use this hypergolic fuel mixture for rockets, for example, the Russian Proton Rocket and as we mentioned before the SpaceX Crew Dragon Capsule. Maybe we will find a better Hypergolic fuel mixture in the future that is not toxic and completely safe, but for now, this is the best one we have.

Popular posts from this blog

Starship SN10 Aborts at T - 0 Seconds for its 10km test flight.

  Moments ago, Starship SN10 attempted a flight to 10km, to then orient itself into a unique horizontal bellyflop position, flip itself upright after it has descended to about 1km, deploy the landing legs, and touch down on the landing pad softly. This vehicle, Starship Number 10, uses Liquid CH4 (methane) and Liquid Oxygen aka LOX/LO2, used by its 3 powerful Raptor engines.  Today, SpaceX started their official stream for the Starship SN10 Flight. SpaceX have privated the stream replay, so we cannot replay it. In case you want the link: The vehicle began fueling up with Methane and LOX, and then shortly after, it started the engine chill process, which is the process of chilling the engines down in preparation for engine ignition, so the engine material does not crack or get damaged from sudden shock. The vehicle attempted to start up its 3 Raptor engines, by opening the fuel & oxidizer valves, starting up the turbopumps, sho

What is “the best” programming language?

Programming languages, there are so many of them. Some programming languages are way easier to learn than other ones. But which programming language, is “the best” programming language? This question, it is not really answerable. There is no “best programming languages”, they are all meant for different things, well, MOST of them. If I were to compare 2 different programming languages, meant for very similar things, like Batch and Bash, I would say Batch is easier, as its Syntax is not as confusing as Bash’s to the average person. Here is another example, C# is primarily used for computer applications, mostly on Windows, and HTML is a markup language, being used to make websites. I cannot compare C# (it is pronounced “See Sharp” if you didn’t know) because they are used for completely different things. It wouldn’t make sense to say, “C# is way better”, because what is it better at? Developing desktop applications? Sure! Then I can say HTML is better at making websites, it is not a logi

How do you know the universe was not created a few minutes ago?

       The universe is the giant area of space that we live in, which is observable. Anything past our universal border is not in our universe. People do say the universe is constantly expanding, but there is no proof of that, as the "imaginary" or, maybe not imaginary border at the "end" of our universe. But, how do you know that the universe even exists? Were you even in it last week? Did last week even exist? Last week, the universe could have been created, and you do not have proof against it. All of your knowledge and memory could have easily popped into existence a few seconds ago, tricking you into thinking you have existed for longer than you think. This is likely, but also unlikely, it is a 50/50 chance. A reason that this is unlikely is, there are a lot of things that do not make sense in our universe. Like, why does matter attract matter, resulting in gravity? This exists in our universe, but can it exist in a different universe? Not really, or most likel