Skip to main content

Different methods for propulsion in outer space


Can I move in space?

No matter how much you move in space with your arms or legs, nothing will happen, you simply won't go anywhere. You need to create force by pushing something out of an end, usually by converting thermal energy to kinetic energy.

How do rockets move in space?

Rockets ignite a mixture of a fuel and an oxidizer in space in a rocket engines combustion chamber, and have it shoot out the nozzle at supersonic speeds, resulting in thrust being produce. Any rocket that lifts off from Earth uses this method, no matter if the rocket uses solid fuel, liquid fuel, or uses hybrid fuel. When you burn fuel, energy is released. On Earth, there is oxygen, a lot of it, so if you use a rocket engine on Earth, you don't necessarily always need an oxidizer mixed with your fuel since Earth already has so much oxygen in the air. In space, there is no oxygen, so to burn fuel, you can bring your own oxidizer, usually liquid oxygen. Liquid Oxygen is more dense than gaseous oxygen, so you can store more of it, which is why rockets like SpaceX's Starship, Falcon 9, and why ULA's Delta and Atlas rockets use Liquid Oxygen, aka LOX/LO2.

This seems complicated, is this the only way to move stuff around in space?

No, there are other methods of propulsion in space. There is something called an Ion Thruster, which generates thrust electronically. It creates thrust by accelerating ions by using electricity. It ionizes a neutral gas like Krypton or Xenon, by extracting electrons out of atoms, creating a cloud of positive ions. This isn't the only alternative method, you can use a cold-gas thruster, which is basically highly compressed gaseous nitrogen, helium, or oxygen, which is shot out of a tube or miniature combustion chamber. It's basically a large fire extinguisher, except it is way more compressed therefore being under more pressure, and doesn't have CO2 inside. Nitrogen is used for cold-gas thrusters because it is cheap, as it makes up over 70% of our atmosphere, and Helium is used because of how insanely light and "un dense" it is. These are called cold-gas thrusters, because the gas isn't hot. Hot gas thrusters are usually used in RCS/Reaction Control Systems, which use Hypergolic fuels. It's just like a cold-gas thruster, except hot, and contains a fuel and oxidizer. These act quick because the fuel and oxidizers are hypergolic, therefore combusting apon contact. You can also use a reaction wheel, which is a high-velocity spinning wheel to turn a spacecraft another way, but it does not produce any thrust, at least not any significant thrust.

Okay, sounds good, but which propulsion method is the best and most efficient?

It depends what you are using it for. If you are using a series of tiny  thrusters to re orient your spacecraft in another direction, cold-gas thrusters are they way to go. They are cheap and fast, but a lot of cold gas thrusters eat through their fuel quickly. If you are creating a rocket engine to propel a spacecraft really fast, liquid fuel is the way to go, as you can throttle it and shut it down when needed, and you have a big amount of options for which fuel you want to use, including Kerolox (kerosene + liquid oxygen), Hydrolox (hydrogen + liquid oxygen), Methalox (methane + liquid oxygen), and much more, including hypergolic fuels like Hydrazine and Dinitrogen Tetroxide. Rocket engines use different cycles, so this can alter the amount of thrust it produces, but that will be talked about in a future Swivro Blog Post. Thanks for reading!

Popular posts from this blog

Starship SN10 Aborts at T - 0 Seconds for its 10km test flight.

  Moments ago, Starship SN10 attempted a flight to 10km, to then orient itself into a unique horizontal bellyflop position, flip itself upright after it has descended to about 1km, deploy the landing legs, and touch down on the landing pad softly. This vehicle, Starship Number 10, uses Liquid CH4 (methane) and Liquid Oxygen aka LOX/LO2, used by its 3 powerful Raptor engines.  Today, SpaceX started their official stream for the Starship SN10 Flight. SpaceX have privated the stream replay, so we cannot replay it. In case you want the link: The vehicle began fueling up with Methane and LOX, and then shortly after, it started the engine chill process, which is the process of chilling the engines down in preparation for engine ignition, so the engine material does not crack or get damaged from sudden shock. The vehicle attempted to start up its 3 Raptor engines, by opening the fuel & oxidizer valves, starting up the turbopumps, sho

What is “the best” programming language?

Programming languages, there are so many of them. Some programming languages are way easier to learn than other ones. But which programming language, is “the best” programming language? This question, it is not really answerable. There is no “best programming languages”, they are all meant for different things, well, MOST of them. If I were to compare 2 different programming languages, meant for very similar things, like Batch and Bash, I would say Batch is easier, as its Syntax is not as confusing as Bash’s to the average person. Here is another example, C# is primarily used for computer applications, mostly on Windows, and HTML is a markup language, being used to make websites. I cannot compare C# (it is pronounced “See Sharp” if you didn’t know) because they are used for completely different things. It wouldn’t make sense to say, “C# is way better”, because what is it better at? Developing desktop applications? Sure! Then I can say HTML is better at making websites, it is not a logi

How do you know the universe was not created a few minutes ago?

       The universe is the giant area of space that we live in, which is observable. Anything past our universal border is not in our universe. People do say the universe is constantly expanding, but there is no proof of that, as the "imaginary" or, maybe not imaginary border at the "end" of our universe. But, how do you know that the universe even exists? Were you even in it last week? Did last week even exist? Last week, the universe could have been created, and you do not have proof against it. All of your knowledge and memory could have easily popped into existence a few seconds ago, tricking you into thinking you have existed for longer than you think. This is likely, but also unlikely, it is a 50/50 chance. A reason that this is unlikely is, there are a lot of things that do not make sense in our universe. Like, why does matter attract matter, resulting in gravity? This exists in our universe, but can it exist in a different universe? Not really, or most likel