Skip to main content

Boeing Space, there are so many delays and issues.


Recently Boeing Space (and Boeing) have been under a lot of hate by fans of spaceflight.

The reason that they have been receiving hate boils down to a few reasons, the main reason is; slow progress on the NASA SLS Rocket (Space Launch System) and the Starliner capsule.

The main focus of this post is the Starliner capsule, so we will not be going into much detail about the SLS.


The Boeing Space Starliner Capsule has been delayed for over 3 years at this point, and soon maybe 4, originally targeting 2018 for its first crewed test flight. It has since only executed one un-crewed test flight that was only considered a partial success since a clock failure caused the vehicle to burn through massive amounts of RCS fuel, because without its clock it did not know which way it was pointing. The mission ultimately was barred from rendezvousing with the International Space Station due to these failures.

"At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if it slips into 2022" - Kasper (Swivro CEO)

With these kinds of delays, it really puts into question why NASA is still agreeing to pay Boeing twice as much as the other company selected for the Commercial Crew Contract (SpaceX and the Crew Dragon 2 Capsule). Yes, that’s right. The vehicle that has flown humans flawlessly to the ISS twice, has had a flawless uncrewed and crewed rendezvous demonstration with the International Space Station, and has demonstrated a flawless and safe in flight abort test if anything were to go wrong, is getting paid about half the price, that Boeing, the company that can’t seem to get their capsule into a stable orbit without issues, is. Why? No reason.

Starliner Pros and Cons:


The more crewed vehicles we have going to the International Space Station, the better. Boeing’s Starliner Space Capsule provides high crew and cargo transport capability therefore extending the station's lifetime.

It takes more pressure off NASA to outsource crew and cargo transport for the International Space Station to private companies like Boeing, SpaceX, Northrup Grumman, and more, as NASA currently does not have an operational launch vehicle capable of resupplying the space station with crew and cargo.

By doing this, it means that other programs can have more resources focused on helping take NASA's goals of space exploration even further than they could if they were having to develop vehicles for the International Space Station.


The cost

As mentioned before, Boeing Space has received just over twice as much money for the Starliner Capsule despite a seat costing 90 million USD (In 2021 dollars) per seat compared to the Crew Dragon 2's 45 million USD per seat. Yes, its crazy. Again, why?, no reason. “Boeing is more experienced”, does not count as a reason, as SpaceX has simply disproven that.

Questionable safety practices

Boeing Space has been shown as quite negligent when it comes to flight software. In the un-crewed test flight of the Starliner, they had to check over 2 million lines of code due to a failure in the spacecraft's clock.

Speaking of the clock, they use a clock to determine the attitude of the spacecraft based on the T+ of the mission, not using math or star tracking, this is a very flawed system as shown by the first un-crewed test flight of the Starliner in which a clock failure completely stopped the Starliner from gong to the International Space Station. Another safety flaw is a lack of testing of very trivial systems, for example, they did not test the Service Module separation RCS firings, had they not checked them because of the failure in the clock, the service module would have crashed into the capsule damaging the heatshield and dooming the mission for the crew and the capsule.



So, after we have laid out all of this information and listed these pros and cons, we can say that everything Boeing Space has ever done is full of delays, high costs, negligent safety practices, and the exploitation of cost-plus contracting. Boeing, you need to get your stuff together or else things don’t look too good for you.

This blog post was made by a Swivro Contributor, named Delta. Thanks Delta!


Popular posts from this blog

Starship SN10 Aborts at T - 0 Seconds for its 10km test flight.

  Moments ago, Starship SN10 attempted a flight to 10km, to then orient itself into a unique horizontal bellyflop position, flip itself upright after it has descended to about 1km, deploy the landing legs, and touch down on the landing pad softly. This vehicle, Starship Number 10, uses Liquid CH4 (methane) and Liquid Oxygen aka LOX/LO2, used by its 3 powerful Raptor engines.  Today, SpaceX started their official stream for the Starship SN10 Flight. SpaceX have privated the stream replay, so we cannot replay it. In case you want the link: The vehicle began fueling up with Methane and LOX, and then shortly after, it started the engine chill process, which is the process of chilling the engines down in preparation for engine ignition, so the engine material does not crack or get damaged from sudden shock. The vehicle attempted to start up its 3 Raptor engines, by opening the fuel & oxidizer valves, starting up the turbopumps, sho

What is “the best” programming language?

Programming languages, there are so many of them. Some programming languages are way easier to learn than other ones. But which programming language, is “the best” programming language? This question, it is not really answerable. There is no “best programming languages”, they are all meant for different things, well, MOST of them. If I were to compare 2 different programming languages, meant for very similar things, like Batch and Bash, I would say Batch is easier, as its Syntax is not as confusing as Bash’s to the average person. Here is another example, C# is primarily used for computer applications, mostly on Windows, and HTML is a markup language, being used to make websites. I cannot compare C# (it is pronounced “See Sharp” if you didn’t know) because they are used for completely different things. It wouldn’t make sense to say, “C# is way better”, because what is it better at? Developing desktop applications? Sure! Then I can say HTML is better at making websites, it is not a logi

How do you know the universe was not created a few minutes ago?

       The universe is the giant area of space that we live in, which is observable. Anything past our universal border is not in our universe. People do say the universe is constantly expanding, but there is no proof of that, as the "imaginary" or, maybe not imaginary border at the "end" of our universe. But, how do you know that the universe even exists? Were you even in it last week? Did last week even exist? Last week, the universe could have been created, and you do not have proof against it. All of your knowledge and memory could have easily popped into existence a few seconds ago, tricking you into thinking you have existed for longer than you think. This is likely, but also unlikely, it is a 50/50 chance. A reason that this is unlikely is, there are a lot of things that do not make sense in our universe. Like, why does matter attract matter, resulting in gravity? This exists in our universe, but can it exist in a different universe? Not really, or most likel